OMRA Legal News

<<<<BACK to website 


Ninth Circuit Court Sets Precedent for Science in Landmark  ESA Case

Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:07:37 -0500
From: Resources Communications <Resources.Press@MAIL.HOUSE.GOV>
Subject: Ninth Circuit Court Sets Precedent for Science in Landmark ESA
Ca se
Approved-by: Resources.Press@MAIL.HOUSE.GOV
To: PRESSRELEASES-CA11@ls1.house.gov

For Immediate Release
February 25, 2004
Contact Brian Kennedy at (202) 226-9019

Ninth Circuit Court Sets Precedent for Science in Landmark ESA Case

Washington, DC - A ruling yesterday by the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals confirmed a lower court's decision that scientific
contributions to species recovery must be incorporated in Endangered
Species Act (ESA) decision making. At issue in this case was how the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) counted Oregon Coast coho
salmon in determining the species' status.

Background: The Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) filed suit in U.S.
District Court charging that NMFS counted only naturally spawned
salmon, disregarding hatchery spawned salmon, thereby keeping fish
counts artificially low and invoking unnecessary protection under the
ESA. District Court Judge Michael Hogan agreed, ruling that the
agency acted illegally. As a result, NMFS instituted status reviews
of salmon and steelhead listed under the ESA across Western States.
Environmentalists then appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit, which
also ruled in favor of PLF. In dismissing the appeal, the court ruled
that environmentalists could participate in the public process on
status reviews like other citizens and had no basis for suit.

"This could be the best precedent ever set in Endangered Species Act
case law," Resources Committee Chairman Richard W. Pombo (R-CA) said.
"By arguing that some fish are somehow superior to other fish,
environmentalists have once again revealed their radical beliefs that
humans can do no good for species. Given modern science and common
sense, this court just reaffirmed that such extreme positions are
absurd and can be detrimental to species recovery. To be successful
in our stewardship role we have to use all the tools at our disposal,
especially advanced science."

"Hopefully, this case will serve as a catalyst for the use of 21st
century science and American ingenuity in species recovery," Pombo
continued. "That's exactly what we need to do to be successful, and
Americans understand that. Endless, frivolous litigation does nothing
to save species, but that is the unfortunate state of the ESA today."

"With the Ninth Circuit's dismissal of this appeal, the 'sky is
falling' rhetoric of hard-core environmental activists has been
debunked and their true agenda exposed," said PLF attorney, Russ
Brooks. "This attempt to control private land use in the name of
species protection has been successfully shut down. Families in the
Pacific Northwest are sick of environmental hysterics that have
resulted in rising home prices, choking traffic, higher taxes and a
slowed economy," Brooks continued. "Chalk up a win for people with
today's decision."

According to Brooks, the biggest impact of the decision is the fact
that it reinstates the district court's order invalidating and
setting aside the coho listing, which had been postponed during the
appeal. Consequently, the Oregon Coast coho listing no longer exists
and may not be enforced. This decision stands to have huge
implications for land stewards and natural resource providers-such as
farmers, ranchers, and timber harvesters -- as well as local
governments and citizens struggling with infrastructure development
of schools, hospitals, and highways.

Following news of the decision, PLF called on NMFS to promptly
complete its review of the hatchery policy and salmon and steelhead
listings, consistent with the district court and Ninth Circuit
decisions. NMFS has missed several deadlines in releasing the new
hatchery policy and the results of its status review.

###


--
John Stewart
Director, Environmental Affairs
United Four Wheel Drive Associations, http://www.ufwda.org
Natural Resource Consultant
California Association of 4 Wheel Drive Clubs, http://www.ca4wdc.com
Recreation Access and Conservation Editor, http://www.4x4wire.com
Moderator, MUIRNet - Multiple Use Information Resource Network


Oregon's Coho Salmon Are Partying Tonight - They're Not Going Extinct After All - (Applegate Article)
http://www.applegateoregonnews.com/articles/index.cfm?artOID=177728&cp=10963

9:38 pm PT, Tuesday, Feb 24, 2004
Oregon's Coho Salmon Are Partying Tonight - They're Not Going Extinct After All
   
 

By Dennis M. Becklin
Publisher / SouthernOregonNews.com

 

The Ninth District Court of Appeals announced today that it is throwing out the Endangered Species Act "threatened" listing of Oregon coastal coho salmon. There's going to be a lot of crow to eat by State and Federal agency operatives, Oregon editorialists and environmentalists who foisted this ESA travesty on the people of Oregon and on the resource based industries of this state.


 

Right at the top of my crow-eating list is former Governor John Kitzhaber. This governor spent eight years in office pushing the radical environmental salmon agenda. What did he gain for the state? Economic disaster.

 

Kitzhaber's fixation with saving un-threatened salmon ushered in a calamitous loss of timer industry jobs, countless costs for litigation expenses by resource based industries and an era of economically threatened Oregon communities.

 

One of those legal actions was directed at the Grants Pass Irrigation District. The ESA coho listing was the club used by State and Federal agencies and environmentalists to beat the irrigation district into submission. Now, GPID will receive the consolation prize of knowing that it was right in its litigation position all along...that the cohos were not going extinct.

 

The coho decision in the Court of Appeals came too late for GPID. Savage Rapids Dam will be removed at a cost of many millions of dollars...and its removal will not make one whit of difference in the numbers of salmon or steelhead in the Rogue River . Contrary to State and Federal fish bureaucrats who zealously scrambled all over Savage Rapids Dam in the spring of 1998 trying to document the death of just one wild coho juvenile so that GPID could be fined and tortured in legal proceedings...the cohos were not ever going to become extinct.

 

Studies at the dam in 1998 and 1999 determined conclusively that the dam kills virtually no fish, despite the trumped-up claims in the Final Environmental Report prepared by the Federal Government. But...oh well...NewsAshland.comwe're just going to demolish the dam anyway and chalk up the experience to Kitzhaber's wayward dam hatred.

 

Also near the top of my crow-eating list are all of the pseudo-environmentalists and other environmentalists who have been proclaiming hatchery fish to be inferior to wild fish of the same species. The Appeals Court allowed to stand the earlier decision by US District Court Judge Michael Hogan that a coho, is a coho, is a coho, is a coho. Fish that are genetically identical, as are wild and hatchery cohos, are in fact identical.

 

Also, right up there in the crow pecking order is a litany of Oregon editorialists who curtsied to the false science of self-proclaimed salmon-savers and spread the gospel of coho falsehoods far and wide. To them...an extra portion of crow for the distorted view that many citizens subscribed to after hearing the same wild/hatchery fish baloney over and over and over.

 

Some of the damage done to Oregon 's resource based industries is irreparable. Those zealots who are responsible for pursuing false claims about cohos in the name of science should pay a very big price...but they won't, of course.

 

The hundreds of millions of dollars thrown at unnecessary salmon recovery is ghastly. The only benefactors of this waste are the environmental law firms that profited by claiming and receiving their legal fees, paid for by American taxpayers, under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act

 

For the press release from the Pacific Legal Foundation, which fought and won this case...click here.

http://www.pacificlegal.org/view_PLFNews.asp?iID=229&sTitle=Oregon+Coast+Salmon+Listing+Invalidated%3A+Ninth+Circuit+Dismisses+Appeal+of+Landmark+%3Ci%3EAlsea%3C%2Fi%3E+Case%2D%2D%2DBogus+ESA+Protections+for+%93Wild%94+Salmon+Must+Go

 

The cohos deserve to party tonight...They're not going extinct. What a great excuse for a fish party.

 

Dennis M. Becklin, Publisher
SouthernOregonNews LLC
GrantsPassNews.com
MedfordNews.com

 

Search References:

Oregon

Oregon News

Oregon Environment

Oregon Politics

Contact info: Dennis M. Becklin may be reached at dennis@SouthernOregonNews.com.